artha rin adalat ain 2003 bangladesh pdf files

Three Pilot Family Courts were established in the Dhaka Judgeship, which exclusively used judicial settlement to resolve family cases including: divorce, restitution of conjugal rights, dower, maintenance and custody of children. The pilot program began in a collaborative effort with ISDLS in a series of Bangladeshi legal studies of Californian ADR systems.

Introduction In June 2000, formalized ADR was introduced in Bangladesh by means of court- annexed judicial settlement pilot projects, in an effort to decrease delays, expenses, and the frustrations of litigants laboring through the traditional trial process. That the statements of facts made above are true to the best of my knowledge and belief, and the rest are verbal submissions before this Honble Court and in verification whereof I signed this Affidavit on.ĭEPONENT The deponent is known to me and identified by me and he has signed this affidavit in my presence.

That I am an officer of the plaintiff bank and as such am fully acquainted with the facts and circumstances of the case and competent to swear this affidavit. Jamal, son of late Kamal Mia, National Bank Ltd, Dilkusha Branch,48,Dilkusha Commercial Area, Dhaka-1000,aged about 42 years, occupation service, by faith Muslim, Nationality Bangladeshi, do hereby solemnly affirm and say as follows: 1. SCHEDULE-1 Description of loan and amount outstanding Principle loan amount Interest other Expenses Outstanding 3, 00, 00, 000 50, 00, 000 - 3, 50, 00, 000 SCHEDULE-2 AFFIDAVIT I, Mr. (C) Costs of the suit (D) Any other relief entitled in law and equity. Wherefore the plaintiff most humbly pray before the honourable court: (A) A decree for sum of taka 3, 50, 00, 000 only interest calculated up to in favor of the plaintiff bank and against the defendant (B) A decree for pendent lite interest at the rate stipulated in the Artha Rin Adalat Ain, 2003. Jamal, who is aware of all facts, will represent the suit. An authorized representative of plaintiff Bank, Mr. The plaintiff bank has paid necessary court fees. The cause of action arose in Dhaka on when the bank sanctioned loan and served notice to defendant No: 2 on 10-12-14 to come forward and pay the loan. The present outstanding liability of the defendant No: 1 is taka 3, 50, 00, 000 up to. Legal notice was served on 10-12-14 to defendant No: 2 but he did not make any payment due to the bank. Defendant No: 2 wanted to extend the time but after that willfully restrained from making any payment. On 08-09-12, 03-07-13, 05-05-14 plaint vides series of letter to defendant No: 2 but defendant No: 2 was reluctant to pay the loan.

Defendant No: 2 showed different excuses in paying the loan. The plaintiff bank verbally and in written informed defendant No: 2 but it was in vain. Defendant No:1 failed to repay the loan after the validity period expired on. For the security defendant No: 1 executed the following documents: a) Demand Promissory Note b) Letter of Continuity c) Letter of Hypothecation of bills. The account was opened for the sanction of 3, 00, 00,000 taka for executing the work order of the industry. 4 of 1990), after filing of written statement, if all the contesting parties are in attendance in the Court in person.Ģ opened a bank account on behalf of defendant No.1 and the account No. (1) Except in a suit under the Artha Rin Adalat Ain, 1990 (Act No. From being in the hospitality industry to owning and operating. My back ground includes a wide mix of experiences and business ventures. To free itself from the grip of the NPL debacle.

Act 2003) was enacted in 2003 with a view to improving the legal framework for recovery of. Measures on recovery of defaulted loan such as Artha Rin Adalat Ain (Money Loan Court. Table-8 Statement of Suits Filed and Settled in the Artha Rin Adalat. The defendant No: 1 is a company incorporated under the relevant Companies Act, 1994 and is the proprietor of M/S Smart Industries. The plaintiff is a banking company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1994 and is situated at 192 Kataban Road, Police Station: Nilkhet in Dhaka and hereby will be known as the plaintiff bank. The above named plaintiff most respectfully: Sheweth: 1. Kamal Address: 112, Shegun Bagicha Police Station: Ramna District: Dhaka.Defendants SUIT FOR RECOVERY OF MONEY Suit valued at taka 3, 50, 00,000 upto 16-04-15. Police Station: Mirpur.ĭistrict: Dhaka 2. Name: Abdul Halim Proprietor of: M/S Smart Industries Address: 103, Mirpur, 11. IN THE COURT OF 2nd ARTHA RIN ADALAT AIN, DHAKA ARTHA RIN SUIT NO: 06 OF 2015 AB Bank Limited House No: 193 Kataban Road Police Station: Nilkhet District: Dhaka.Plaintiff - Versus- 1. Artha Rin Adalat Ain 2003 Bangladesh Pdf Free Pdf.Artha Rin Adalat Ain 2003 Bangladesh Pdf Free Online.

Artha rin adalat ain 2003 bangladesh pdf files